Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  788 860 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 788 860 Next Page
Page Background

utilising either ultrasound or electrohydraulic energy,

neither of which are recommended in contemporary

guidelines

[4] .

These simple differences underline the

problems with study heterogeneity and the impact of their

outcomes on systematic reviews.

In terms of surgical outcomes, prospectively collected

multicentre databases such as the Clinical Research Office of

the Endourology Society database and those managed by

national specialty associations can provide useful data on

trends in both treatment outcomes and techniques

[5]

, but

the cases entered are inherently biased, and data are rarely

collected on the reasons for the particular treatment being

chosen. Surgeon-reported outcome data are also often

criticised for being less robust than adequate RCT data.

Possibly more importantly, we are finally beginning to

see a shift in the quality of data not only in terms of trial size

and design but also in the inclusion of validated patient-

reported outcomes (PROMs) and quality-of-life data, which

are sure to play a larger part in better informing our patients

to allow them to make the best decisions regarding their

management. Questionnaires such as the International

Stent Symptom Questionnaire are accepted and validated in

numerous languages for worldwide use and, alongside the

newer PROMs. It is to be hoped that these will not only allow

us to better understand the impact of treatments on

patients at an individual level but will also allow much

better homogeneity of trial outcome data and more

cohesive reviews and meta-analysis of data in the future.

Studies such as the SUSPEND trial

[6]

have shown the value

of good-quality trial design and that it is feasible in modern

endourology practice to recruit large numbers of patients to

multicentre trials, thus improving our knowledge base.

Following on from the success of the SUSPEND trial in the

UK, the same research group has completed recruitment to

a further multicentre prospective RCT comparing SWL to

URS for the management of single ureteric calculi. The TISU

trial has recently closed to recruitment and should report in

the near future, and may go some way to furthering the

evidence base for this topic.

Management of upper ureteric calculi represents a daily

treatment challenge for endourologists. This most up-to-

date analysis of the data is a powerful reminder of the need

for a cohesive global approach to construction and reporting

of future trials in this area so that we can produce better-

quality guidelines for surgeons and ultimately clear

messages for our patients.

Conflicts of interest:

Jacob Patterson has received payment from Porgès

Coloplast for consultancy, the post of advisory board chair, delivery of

educational courses, and sponsorship for meetings; from Boston

Scienti

fi

c for consultancy and delivery of educational courses;

and from Astellas as sponsorship for meetings. William Finch has

received payment from Boston Scienti

fi

c and Porgès Coloplast for

delivery of educational courses and from Boston Scienti

fi

c for

consultancy.

References

[1]

Drake T, Grivas N, Dabestani S, et al. What are the bene fi ts and harms of ureteroscopy comparedwith shock-wave lithotripsy in the treatment of upper ureteral stones?. A systematic review. Eur Urol 2017;72:772 86

.

[2]

Preminger GM, Tiselius HG, Assimos DG, et al. 2007 guideline for the management of ureteral calculi. Eur Urol 2007;52:1610 31

.

[3]

Turk C, Petrik A, Sarica K, et al. EAU guidelines on interventional treatment for urolithiasis. Eur Urol 2016;69:475 82

.

[4]

Lee YH, Tsai JY, Jiaan BP, Wu T, Yu CC. Prospective randomized trial comparing shock wave lithotripsy and ureteroscopic lithotripsy for management of large upper third ureteral stones. Urology 2006;67:480 4

.

[5]

Perez Castro E, Osther PJ, Jinga V, et al. Differences in ureteroscopic stone treatment and outcomes for distal, mid-, proximal, or multi- ple ureteral locations: the Clinical Research Of fi ce of the Endour- ological Society ureteroscopy global study. Eur Urol 2014;66:102 9

.

[6]

Pickard R, Starr K, MacLennan G, et al. Medical expulsive therapy in adults with ureteric colic: a multicentre, randomised, placebo- controlled trial. Lancet 2015;386:341 9

.

E U R O P E A N U R O L O GY 7 2 ( 2 0 17 ) 7 8 7

7 8 8

788