785 860
[26]
Lee JH, Woo SH, Kim ET, Kim DK, Park J. Comparison of patient satisfaction with treatment outcomes between ureteroscopy and shock wave lithotripsy for proximal ureteral stones. Korean J Urol 2010;51:788–93.[27]
Izamin I, Aniza I, Rizal AM, Aljunid SM. Comparing extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy and ureteroscopy for treatment of proximal ureteric calculi: a cost-effectiveness study. Med J Malaysia 2009;64:12–21.[28]
Youssef RF, El-Nahas AR, El-Assmy AM, et al. Shock wave lithotripsy versus semirigid ureteroscopy for proximal ureteral calculi ( < 20 mm): a comparative matched-pair study. Urology 2009;73: 1184–7.
[29]
Wu CF, Chen CS, Lin WY, et al. Therapeutic options for proximal ureter stone: extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy versus semi- rigid ureterorenoscope with holmium:yttrium-aluminum-garnet laser lithotripsy. Urology 2005;65:1075–9.[30]
Fong YK, Ho SH, Peh OH, et al. Extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy and intracorporeal lithotripsy for proximal ureteric calculi–a com- parative assessment of efficacy and safety. Ann AcadMed Singapore 2004;33:80–3.[31]
Parker BD, Frederick RW, Reilly TP, Lowry PS, Bird ET. Efficiency and cost of treating proximal ureteral stones: shock wave lithotripsy versus ureteroscopy plus holmium:yttrium-aluminum-garnet la- ser. Urology 2004;64:1102–6, discussion 6.[32]
Wu CF, Shee JJ, Lin WY, Lin CL, Chen CS. Comparison between extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy and semirigid ureteroreno- scope with holmium:YAG laser lithotripsy for treating large proxi- mal ureteral stones. J Urol 2004;172:1899–902.[33]
Lam JS, Greene TD, Gupta M. Treatment of proximal ureteral calculi: holmium:YAG laser ureterolithotripsy versus extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy. J Urol 2002;167:1972–6.
[34]
Hammad Ather M. Optimal minimally invasive treatment of ure- terolithiasis. Brazilian J Urol 2001;27:128–32.[35]
Kumar A, Jain M, Prakash S, Mohanty N. A prospective randomized comparison between shock wave lithotripsy and semi-rigid ure- teroscopy for upper ureteric stones less than 2 cm: a single centre experience. J Urol 2010;183:e559.[36]
Bhoir A, Shanmughadas K, Madhavan N, et al. Comparison of patient reported outcomes and treatment related outcomes be- tween Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) and ureter- osopy (URS) for proximal ureteral calculi. USICON. Indian J Urol 2014:S60.[37]
Natarajan V, Prakash J, Vethachalam K, Meyyappan R, Kamaraj V, Jeyaraman R. Comparison of patient satisfaction with treatment outcomes between ureteroscopy and shock wave lithotripsy for proximal ureteral stones. USICON. Indian J Urol 2014:S64.[38]
YuQing L. A comparative matched-pair study between shock wave lithotripsy and ureteroscopy for proximal ureteral calculi. 29th World Congress of endourology & SWL. J Endourol 2011:A121.[39]
Uguz S, Senkul T, Soydan H, et al. Immediate or delayed SWL in ureteric stones: a prospective and randomized study. Urol Res 2012;40:739–44.[40]
Kumar A, Mohanty NK, Jain M, Prakash S, Arora RP. A prospective randomized comparison between early ( < 48 h ours of onset of colicky pain) versus delayed shockwave lithotripsy for symptom- atic upper ureteral calculi: a single center experience. J Endourol 2010;24:2059–66.
[41]
Choi HJ, Jung JH, Bae J, Cho MC, Lee HW, Lee KS. Usefulness of early extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy in colic patients with ure- teral stones. Korean J Urol 2012;53:853–9.[42]
Ates F, Eryildirim B, Ozturk MI, et al. Does the use of doxazosin influence the success of SWL in the treatment of upper ureteral stones? A multicenter, prospective and randomized study. Urol Res 2012;40:537–42.[43]
Elkoushy MA. Adjuvant alpha adrenergic blockers: are they equally efficient for renal and upper ureteral calculi disintegrated by shock wave lithotripsy? African J Urol 2012;18:24–8.
[44]
Agarwal MM, Naja V, Singh SK, et al. Is there an adjunctive role of tamsulosin to extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy for upper ure- teric stones: results of an open label randomized nonplacebo controlled study. Urology 2009;74:989–92.[45]
Porpiglia F, Destefanis P, Fiori C, Scarpa RM, Fontana D. Role of adjunctive medical therapy with nifedipine and deflazacort after extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy of ureteral stones. Urology 2002;59:835–8.[46]
Zomorrodi A, Golivandan J, Samady J. Effect of diuretics on ureteral stone therapy with extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy. Saudi J Kidney Dis Transpl 2008;19:397–400.[47]
Azm TA, Higazy H. Effect of diuresis on extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy treatment of ureteric calculi. Scand J Urol Nephrol 2002;36:209–12.[48]
Seitz C, Fajkovic H, Waldert M, et al. Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy in the treatment of proximal ureteral stones: does the presence and degree of hydronephrosis affect success? Eur Urol 2006;49:378–83.
[49]
Goktas S, Peskircioglu L, Tahmaz L, Kibar Y, Erduran D, Harmankaya C. Is there significance of the choice of prone versus supine position in the treatment of proximal ureter stones with extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy? Eur Urol 2000;38:618–20.[50]
Zomorrodi A, Elahian A, Ghorbani N, Tavoosi A. Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy in prone and supine positions for patients with upper ureteral calculi. Urol J 2006;3:130–3.[51]
Moon KB, Lim GS, Hwang JS, et al. Optimal shock wave rate for shock wave lithotripsy in urolithiasis treatment: a prospective randomized study. Korean J Urol 2012;53:790–4.[52]
Ghoneim IA, El-Ghoneimy MN, El-Naggar AE, Hammoud KM, El- Gammal MY, Morsi AA. Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy in impacted upper ureteral stones: a prospective randomized com- parison between stented and non-stented techniques. Urology 2010;75:45–50.[53]
Honey RJ, Schuler TD, Ghiculete D, Pace KT. Canadian Endourology Group. A randomized, double-blind trial to compare shock wave frequencies of 60 and 120 shocks per minute for upper ureteral stones. J Urol 2009;182:1418–23.[54]
Choi JW, Song PH, Kim HT. Predictive factors of the outcome of extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy for ureteral stones. Korean J Urol 2012;53:424–30.[55]
Jamshaid A, Ather MH, Hussain G, Khawaja KB. Single center, single operator comparative study of the effectiveness of electrohydraulic and electromagnetic lithotripters in the management of 10- to 20- mm single upper urinary tract calculi. Urology 2008;72:991–5.[56]
Chacko J, Moore M, Sankey N, Chandhoke PS. Does a slower treat- ment rate impact the efficacy of extracorporeal shock wave litho- tripsy for solitary kidney or ureteral stones? J Urol 2006;175:1370– 3, discussion 3–4.[57]
Ng CF, Thompson TJ, McLornan L, Tolley DA. Single-center experi- ence using three shockwave lithotripters with different generator designs in management of urinary calculi. J Endourol 2006;20:1–8.
[58]
Portis AJ, Yan Y, Pattaras JG, Andreoni C, Moore R, Clayman R. Matched pair analysis of shock wave lithotripsy effectiveness for comparison of lithotriptors. J Urol 2003;169:58–62.
[59]
Sorensen C, Chandhoke P, Moore M, Wolf C, Sarram A. Comparison of intravenous sedation versus general anesthesia on the efficacy of the Doli 50 lithotriptor. J Urol 2002;168:35–7.
[60]
Rane A, Bradoo A, Rao P, et al. The use of a novel reverse thermo- sensitive polymer to prevent ureteral stone retropulsion during intracorporeal lithotripsy: a randomized, controlled trial. J Urol 2010;183:1417–21.E U R O P E A N U R O L O G Y 7 2 ( 2 0 1 7 ) 7 7 2 – 7 8 6
785