Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  685 860 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 685 860 Next Page
Page Background

References

[1]

Siegel RL, Miller KD, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2016. CA Cancer J Clin 2016;66:7–30.

[2]

Liss MA, Osann K, Canvasser N, et al. Continence definition after radical prostatectomy using urinary quality of life: evaluation of patient reported validated questionnaires. J Urol 2010;183:1464–8

.

[3]

Sanda MG, Dunn RL, Michalski J, et al. Quality of life and satisfaction with outcome among prostate-cancer survivors. N Engl J Med 2008;358:1250–61.

[4]

Begg CB, Riedel ER, Bach PB, et al. Variations in morbidity after radical prostatectomy. N Engl J Med 2002;346:1138–44

.

[5]

Barry MJ, Gallagher PM, Skinner JS, F owler Jr FJ. Adverse effects of robotic-assisted laparoscopic versus open retropubic radical pros- tatectomy among a nationwide random sample of Medicare-age men. J Clin Oncol 2012;30:513–8

.

[6]

Prabhu V, Sivarajan G, Taksler GB, Laze J, Lepor H. Long-term continence outcomes in men undergoing radical prostatectomy for clinically localized prostate cancer. Eur Urol 2014;65:52–7

.

[7]

Donovan JL, Hamdy FC, Lane JA, et al. Patient-reported outcomes after monitoring, surgery, or radiotherapy for prostate cancer. N Engl J Med 2016;375:1425–37.

[8]

Ficarra V, Novara G, Rosen RC, et al. Systematic review and meta- analysis of studies reporting urinary continence recovery after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy. Eur Urol 2012;62:405–17

.

[9]

Galfano A, Ascione A, Grimaldi S, Petralia G, Strada E, Bocciardi AM. A new anatomic approach for robot-assisted laparoscopic prosta- tectomy: a feasibility study for completely intrafascial surgery. Eur Urol 2010;58:457–61

.

[10]

Galfano A, Di Trapani D, Sozzi F, et al. Beyond the learning curve of the Retzius-sparing approach for robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: oncologic and functional results of the first 200 patients with > /=1 year of follow-up. Eur Urol 2013;64:974–80

.

[11]

Menon M, Shrivastava A, Bhandari M, Satyanarayana R, Siva S, Agarwal PK. Vattikuti Institute prostatectomy: technical modifica- tions in 2009. Eur Urol 2009;56:89–96.

[12]

Menon M, Tewari A, Peabody J. Vattikuti Institute prostatectomy: technique. J Urol 2003;169:2289–92.

[13]

Ghani KR, Trinh QD, Menon M. Vattikuti Institute prostatectomy— technique in 2012. J Endourol 2012;26:1558–65.

[14]

Calvert M, Blazeby J, Altman DG, Revicki DA, Moher D, Brundage MD. Reporting of patient-reported outcomes in randomized trials: the CONSORT PRO extension. JAMA 2013;309:814–22.

[15]

Menon M, Muhletaler F, Campos M, Peabody JO. Assessment of early continence after reconstruction of the periprostatic tissues in patients undergoing computer assisted (robotic) prostatectomy: results of a 2 group parallel randomized controlled trial. J Urol 2008;180:1018–23.

[16]

Tsui JF, Shah MB, Weinberger JM, et al. Pad count is a poor measure of the severity of urinary incontinence. J Urol 2013;190:1787–90

.

[17]

Donat SM. Standards for surgical complication reporting in urologic oncology: time for a change. Urology 2007;69:221–5.

[18]

Agarwal PK, Sammon J, Bhandari A, et al. Safety profile of robot- assisted radical prostatectomy: a standardized report of complica- tions in 3317 patients. Eur Urol 2011;59:684–98.

[19]

Menon M, Kaul S, Bhandari A, Shrivastava A, Tewari A, Hemal A. Potency following robotic radical prostatectomy: a questionnaire based analysis of outcomes after conventional nerve sparing and prostatic fascia sparing techniques. J Urol 2005;174:2291–6, dis- cussion 6

.

[20]

Califf RM, Phillips 3rd HR, Hindman MC, et al. Prognostic value of a coronary artery jeopardy score. J Am Coll Cardiol 1985;5:1055–63.

[21]

Zeger SL, Liang KY, Albert PS. Models for longitudinal data: a generalized estimating equation approach. Biometrics 1988;44:1049–60.

[22]

Porpiglia F, Bertolo R, Manfredi M, et al. Total anatomical recon- struction during robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: implica- tions on early recovery of urinary continence. Eur Urol 2016;69:485–95

.

[23]

Student Jr V, Vidlar A, Grepl M, Hartmann I, Buresova E, Student V. Advanced reconstruction of vesicourethral support (ARVUS) during robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: one-year functional out- comes in a two-group randomised controlled trial. Eur Urol 2017;71:822–30

.

[24]

Schuessler WW, Schulam PG, Clayman RV, Kavoussi LR. Laparo- scopic radical prostatectomy: initial short-term experience. Urolo- gy 1997;50:854–7

.

[25]

Sammon JD, Trinh QD, Sukumar S, et al. Long-term follow-up of patients undergoing percutaneous suprapubic tube drainage after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP). BJU Int 2012;110:580–5.

[26]

Lim SK, Kim KH, Shin TY, et al. Retzius-sparing robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: combining the best of retro- pubic and perineal approaches. BJU Int 2014;114:236–44.

[27]

Nyarangi-Dix JN, Radtke JP, Hadaschik B, Pahernik S, Hohenfellner M. Impact of complete bladder neck preservation on urinary conti- nence, quality of life and surgical margins after radical prostatec- tomy: a randomized, controlled, single blind trial. J Urol 2013;189:891–8

.

[28]

Lee S, Kim KB, Jo JK, et al. Prognostic value of focal positive surgical margins after radical prostatectomy. Clin Genitourin Cancer 2016;14:e313–9.

[29]

Ford I, Norrie J. Pragmatic trials. N Engl J Med 2016;375:454–63.

[30]

Bonett DG, Price RM. Statistical inference for a linear function of medians: confidence intervals, hypothesis testing, and sample size requirements. Psychol Methods 2002;7:370–83.

E U R O P E A N U R O L O G Y 7 2 ( 2 0 1 7 ) 6 7 7 – 6 8 5

685