Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  691 860 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 691 860 Next Page
Page Background

biases. Moreover, the effect of confounders such as

pretreatment PSA, pathologic stage, and Gleason score could

not be excluded. Case series were at a high risk of bias

regarding the selection of consecutive patients and incom-

plete outcome data (attrition bias). Supplementary

Figure 1

depicts the funnel plot that was generated to assess the

presence of publication bias in studies comparing the

progression-free survival of aRT versus sRT (

n

= 4).

3.3.

Rationale for postoperative RT in men with aggressive PCa

Historically, approximately 30% of PCa patients treated with

RP harbor extracapsular extension, seminal vesicle inva-

sion, high-grade disease, or lymph node invasion at final

pathology. With the decline of PSA screening and the

popularity of active surveillance, an increase in the

proportion of patients with more advanced disease among

those treated with RP has been observed

[31,75,76] .

These

individuals are, in turn, at increased risk of recurrence after

surgery

[77]

. Due to local disease aggressiveness, RP alone

may not be curative as it does not completely eliminate the

local tumor. The persistence of microscopic and advanced

disease increases the risk of recurrence and up to 50% of

men with post-RP BCR evaluated with molecular imaging

have pathologic uptake in the prostatic fossa or the pelvis

[5,78–81]

. A multimodal approach aimed at maximizing

local regional control that includes postoperative RT might

reduce the risk of biochemical and clinical recurrence,

ultimately improving survival. This hypothesis inspired the

design of prospective randomized trials aimed at assessing

the role of postoperative RT in men with more aggressive

disease characteristics.

3.4.

Prospective randomized trials evaluating the role of aRT

aRT is defined as the administration of RT after surgery to

patients with aggressive disease characteristics in the

absence of signs of recurrence

[82] .

Three randomized

trials addressing the role of postoperative RT have been

completed

( Table 1

). The largest investigation is repre-

sented by the European Organization for Research and

Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) trial 22911, which random-

ized 1005 patients with pT2R1 or pT3N0 PCa to postopera-

tive RT within 16 wk from surgery versus initial

observation. After a median follow-up of 5 yr, aRT

significantly improved BCR and metastasis-free survival

[83]

. At a median follow-up of 127 mo, immediate RT after

surgery reduced the risk of BCR

[6] .

In particular, the 10-yr

BCR-free survival rates were 60.6 versus 41.1% for patients

treated with aRT or initial observation respectively. This

[(Fig._1)TD$FIG]

Records identified through

database searching

(

n

= 834)

Screening

Included

Eligibility

Identification

Additional records identified

through other sources

(

n

= 6)

Records after duplicates removed

(

n

= 352)

Records screened

(

n

= 352)

Records excluded

(

n

= 266)

Full-text articles

assessed for eligibility

(

n

= 86)

Full-text articles

excluded

(

n

= 16)

Studies included in

qualitative synthesis

(

n

= 70)

Fig. 1 – Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews flowchart.

E U R O P E A N U R O L O G Y 7 2 ( 2 0 1 7 ) 6 8 9 – 7 0 9

691