Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  673 860 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 673 860 Next Page
Page Background

intensification protocols ought to be considered for IDC/CA+

prostate cancers in order to offset the adverse prognosis

following radical prostatectomy or image-guided radio-

therapy.

5.

Conclusions

We built upon our previous observation of a common clonal

origin in IDC and its adjacent glandular adenocarcinoma

[11]

, hereby showing that IDC/CA+ prostate cancer is

associated with a prostate cancer

nimbosus

, characterized

by genomic instability, hypoxia, and

SChLAP1

expression.

Collectively, the data confirm that IDC and CA are lethal

subpathologies. Patients with the constellation of adverse

prognostic factors that co-occur with IDC/CA should be

placed on close surveillance and therapy intensification due

to an increased risk of rapid failure and metastasis after

local therapy.

Part of this work has been presented as a mini-

symposium abstract at the AACR Annual Meeting, New

Orleans, 2016, and a Conquer Cancer Foundation merit

award poster abstract at the ASCO Annual Meeting, Chicago,

2016.

Author contributions:

Melvin L.K. Chua

[21_TD$DIFF]

, Theodorus H. van der Kwast and

Robert G. Bristow had full access to all the data in the study and takes

responsibility for the integrity of the data and the accuracy of the data

analysis.

Study concept and design:

Chua, Lo, Murgic, Boutros, van der Kwast,

Bristow.

Acquisition of data:

Chua, Lo, Pintilie, Murgic, Lalonde, Livingstone,

Bhandari, van Leenders, Verhoef, Hoogland, Berlin,

[22_TD$DIFF]

Dal Pra, Mahamud,

Meng, Zhang, Orain, Hovington, Picard, Bergeron, Lacombe, Fradet,

Gopalan, Kweldam, Teˆtu, Reuter, Fraser, van der Kwast.

Analysis and interpretation of data:

Chua, Lo, Pintilie, Lalonde, Livingstone,

Bhandari, Boutros, van der Kwast, Bristow.

Drafting of the manuscript:

Chua, Boutros, van der Kwast, Bristow.

Critical revision of the manuscript for important intellectual content:

Chua,

Pintilie, Lalonde, Bergeron, Kweldam, Boutros, van der Kwast, Bristow.

Statistical analysis:

Chua, Pintilie, Lalonde.

Obtaining funding:

Boutros, Bristow.

Administrative, technical, or material support:

Fleshner.

Supervision:

Boutros, van der Kwast, Bristow.

Other:

None.

Financial disclosures:

Melvin L.K. Chua certifies that all conflicts of

interest, including specific financial interests and relationships and

affiliations relevant to the subject matter or materials discussed in the

manuscript (eg, employment/affiliation, grants or funding, consultan-

cies, honoraria, stock ownership or options, expert testimony, royalties,

or patents filed, received, or pending), are the following: None.

Funding/Support and role of the sponsor:

This study was conducted with

the support of Movember funds through Prostate Cancer Canada, and

with the additional support of the Ontario Institute for Cancer Research,

funded by the Government of Ontario. This work was supported by

Prostate Cancer Canada and is proudly funded by the Movember

Foundation—Grant #RS2014-01. Melvin L.K. Chua is supported by the

Canadian Urologic Oncology Group Research Award and the National

Medical Research Council Singapore Transition Award. Paul C. Boutros

was supported by a Terry Fox Research Institute New Investigator

Award, a Prostate Cancer Canada Rising Star Fellowship, and a CIHR New

Investigator Award. This work has been funded by Fellowships from the

Canadian Institute for Health Research and the Ontario government to

Emilie Lalonde and Vinayak Bhandari. The authors gratefully thank the

Princess Margaret Cancer Centre Foundation and Radiation Medicine

Program Academic Enrichment Fund for support (to Robert G. Bristow).

Robert G. Bristow is a recipient of a Canadian Cancer Society Research

Scientist Award. The specific role of the funding organization or sponsor

is as follows: collection of the data.

Acknowledgments:

The authors thank all the members of the Boutros

and Bristow laboratories for their support and guidance.

Appendix A. Supplementary data

Supplementary data associated with this article can be

found, in the online version, at

http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j. eururo.2017.04.034

.

References

[1]

D’Amico AV, Moul J, Carroll PR, Sun L, Lubeck D, Chen MH. Cancer- specific mortality after surgery or radiation for patients with clini- cally localized prostate cancer managed during the PSA era. J Clin Oncol 2003;21:2163–72

.

[2]

Zumsteg ZS, Spratt DE, Pei I, et al. A new risk classification system for therapeutic decision making with intermediate-risk prostate cancer patients undergoing dose-escalated external-beam radia- tion therapy. Eur Urol 2013;64:895–902

.

[3]

Cooper CS, Eeles R, Wedge DC, et al. Analysis of the genetic phylog- eny of multifocal prostate cancer identifies multiple independent clonal expansions in neoplastic and morphologically normal pros- tate tissue. Nat Genet 2015;47:367–72

.

[4]

Boutros PC, Fraser M, Harding NJ, et al. Spatial genomic heteroge- neity within localized, multifocal prostate cancer. Nat Genet 2015;47:736–45

.

[5]

Lalonde E, Ishkanian AS, Sykes J, et al. Tumour genomic and micro- environmental heterogeneity for integrated prediction of 5-year biochemical recurrence of prostate cancer: a retrospective cohort study. Lancet Oncol 2014;15:1521–32

.

[6]

Hieronymus H, Schultz N, Gopalan A, et al. Copy number alteration burden predicts prostate cancer relapse. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2014;111:11139–44

.

[7]

Van der Kwast T, Al Daoud N, Collette L, et al. Biopsy diagnosis of intraductal carcinoma is prognostic in intermediate and high risk prostate cancer patients treated by radiotherapy. Eur J Cancer 2012;48:1318–25.

[8]

Trudel D, Downes MR, Sykes J, Kron KJ, Trachtenberg J, van der Kwast TH. Prognostic impact of intraductal carcinoma and large cribriform carcinoma architecture after prostatectomy in a con- temporary cohort. Eur J Cancer 2014;50:1610–6.

[9]

Kweldam CF, Wildhagen MF, Steyerberg EW, Bangma CH, van der Kwast TH, van Leenders GJ. Cribriform growth is highly predictive for postoperative metastasis and disease-specific death in Gleason score 7 prostate cancer. Mod Pathol 2015;28:457–64

.

[10]

Lindberg J, Kristiansen A, Wiklund P, Gro¨nberg H, Egevad L. Tracking the origin of metastatic prostate cancer. Eur Urol 2015;67:819–22

.

[11]

Taylor RA, Fraser M, Livingstone J, et al. Germline BRCA2 mutations drive prostate cancers with distinct evolutionary trajectories. Nat Commun 2017;8:13671.

[12]

Taylor BS, Schultz N, Hieronymus H, et al. Integrative genomic profiling of human prostate cancer. Cancer Cell 2010;18:11–22

.

E U R O P E A N U R O L O G Y 7 2 ( 2 0 1 7 ) 6 6 5 – 6 7 4

673