Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  846 860 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 846 860 Next Page
Page Background

1.

Introduction

Clinical risk stratification drives first-line therapy decisions

for patients with prostate cancer (PCa). However, risk

stratification based only on clinicopathologic features such

as preoperative prostate-specific antigen (PSA), clinical

stage, and Gleason score may not capture the full metastatic

potential of a patient’s tumor

[1,2]

. Consequently, there

remains a clinical need to improve patient selection for

active surveillance, localized therapy (radical prostatec-

tomy [RP] or radiation therapy [RT]), and/or multimodality

therapy. In recent years, molecular tests have played an

increasing role in clinical decision making

[3] .

Decipher is a 22-RNA feature biomarker that was

developed and validated to predict the risk of metastasis

[4–7]

. It has also been validated to predict the likelihood of

prostate cancer-specific mortality (PCSM) after RP

[6,8]

. Testing the Decipher genomic classifier on prostate

needle biopsy tissue is feasible

[9,10]

and has been

evaluated in a small cohort of 57 primarily National

Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) low- and interme-

diate-risk patients from Cleveland Clinic

[11]

. In the current

study, we aimed to validate the performance of biopsy

Decipher to predict both metastasis and PCSM in a multi-

institutional cohort of men with NCCN low-, intermediate-,

and high-risk disease who received either first-line RP or

RT androgen deprivation therapy (ADT).

2.

Materials and methods

2.1.

Study cohort

We identified 235 patients treated with either first-line RP

or first-line RT ADT at the discretion of their treating

physician from 1987 to 2014 with available genomic

expression profiles generated from diagnostic biopsy speci-

mens from seven tertiary referral centers: Dana-Farber/

Brigham and Women’s Cancer Center, Cleveland Clinic, Johns

Hopkins, MD Anderson Cancer Center, University of California

San Diego, University of Michigan, and University of Miami.

Entry into the RT ADT cohort required NCCN intermediate-

or high-risk disease. The RP cohort was drawn from a bank of

patients who had adverse pathology at surgery (defined as

either preoperative PSA

>

20 ng/ml, stage pT3 or margin

positive, or RP Grade Group 4), the vast majority of

whom had presented with intermediate- or high-risk PCa.

Patient clinical and genomic data were deposited into the

GenomeDx PCa genomic resource information database

(GRID); institutional review boards at the participating

institutions approved the research protocol under which

the data were collected

[6,10–12]

.

Our initial cohort included 909 patients who met the

eligibility criteria of our study. However, 674 patients did

not have available biopsy tissue or had insufficient RNA

available for analysis. Thus, we compared the clinical

characteristics of patients with genomic profiles versus

those without. Analysis demonstrated comparable pre-

treatment PSA levels and clinical stage between the

genomic and nongenomic patient cohorts, but showed that

patients with available genomic profiles had significantly

higher biopsy Grade Groups (Grade Group 4–5,

p

<

0.001)

and thus significantly higher NCCN risk groups (

p

<

0.001;

Supplementary Table 1).

The primary endpoint of the study was incidence of

clinical metastasis (regional or distant) documented radio-

graphically on computed tomography or bone scan. The

secondary endpoint of the study was PCSM.

2.2.

Specimen collection and handling

Specimen selection and processing has been described

previously

[11] .

Following microarray quality control using

the Affymetrix Power Tools packages

[13] ,

probeset

summarization and normalization was performed utilizing

the single channel array normalization algorithm

[14]

. None

of these samples were used in the development of the

Decipher genomic classifier

[4]

.

2.3.

Calculation of NCCN,

Cancer of the Prostate Risk

Assessment

, and Decipher

NCCN risk groups were calculated as described previously

[15]

. Cancer of the Prostate Risk Assessment (CAPRA) was

calculated using age at diagnosis, pretreatment PSA, biopsy

Grade Group, clinical stage, and percent of positive cores

[16]

. Decipher score was obtained based on a previously

locked 22-biomarker random forest algorithm

[4] .

Of note,

the Decipher score is based purely on the RNA analysis and

does not incorporate clinical data. Previously established

cut-points (3 and 5 for Cancer of the Prostate Risk

Assessment and 0.45 and 0.60 for Decipher) were used

for categorical analysis of the risk models

[6,15]

.

2.4.

Statistical analysis

The significance level was set at 0.05 for all statistical tests

and analyses were performed in R version 3.3 (R Foundation

(hazard ratio: 1.57 per 10% increase in score, 95% CI: 1.03–2.48,

p

= 0.037), with a 5-yr PCSM

rate of 0%, 0%, and 9.4% for Decipher low, intermediate, and high, respectively.

Conclusions:

Biopsy Decipher predicted metastasis and PCSM from diagnostic biopsy

specimens of primarily intermediate- and high-risk men treated with first-line RT or RP.

Patient summary:

Biopsy Decipher predicted metastasis and prostate cancer-specific

mortality risk from diagnostic biopsy specimens.

#

2017 European Association of Urology. Published by Elsevier B.V. This is an open access

article under the CC BY-NC-ND license

( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ )

.

E U R O P E A N U R O L O G Y 7 2 ( 2 0 1 7 ) 8 4 5 – 8 5 2

846