Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  749 860 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 749 860 Next Page
Page Background

1.

Introduction

Telomeres are TTAGGG nucleotide repeats and a protein

complex at chromosome ends that play an essential role in

maintaining chromosomal stability. Due to the inability of

DNA polymerase to fully extend 3

0

DNA ends, telomeres

become gradually shorter with each cell division in the

absence of telomerase activity

[1]

. Although in normal cells

critically short telomeres will trigger cellular senescence

and death, cancer cells can continue to divide despite

telomere shortening and the resultant genomic instability

[2]

. Alternatively, upregulated telomerase activity leading

to increased telomere length may also promote tumorigen-

esis by conferring properties of immortal growth

[3] .

Indeed,

recent studies suggest longer telomere length may be a risk

factor for select tumor types including melanoma, lung

cancer, chronic lymphocytic leukemia, glioma, and ovarian

cancer

[4 7]

.

As such, relative telomere length in peripheral blood

leukocytes has been evaluated in numerous population-

based studies as a suspected marker of cancer risk

[8]

. Most

of these studies have characterized telomere length using

multiplex quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR)

assays

[9] .

Results of studies of leukocyte telomere length

and risk of renal cell carcinoma (RCC) have been inconsis-

tent. Two small hospital-based case-control studies

reported inverse associations between telomere length

and risk of RCC

[10,11] ,

whereas no significant evidence of

an association was observed in a larger population-based

case-control study

[12]

and two cohort-based investiga-

tions using prediagnostic samples

[13,14] .

In contrast,

longer leukocyte telomere length has been associated with

reduced RCC survival

[15]

. Telomerase activity is elevated in

renal tumors compared with adjacent normal renal tissue

and has been associated with clinicopathologic features of

advanced disease

[16,17]

.

These previous studies have several limitations. Leuko-

cyte telomere length measurements in case-control studies,

using postdiagnosis blood samples, may have been influ-

enced by effects of the disease. All studies measured

telomere length from a single time point, which may not

adequately reflect telomere length status in the etiologically

relevant time window, and were susceptible to confounding

from RCC risk factors that may be associated with telomere

length such as smoking

[13,18]

and obesity

[19]

. Further-

more, qPCR-based measurements of telomere length are

sensitive to preanalytic factors such as DNA source material

and extraction method

[12,20,21] .

Nine common genetic variants have been identified in

genome-wide association studies (GWAS) that are associ-

ated with leukocyte telomere length at a level of genome-

wide significance (

p

<

5 10

8

)

[22 24] .

Recent studies

have evaluated the relationship between these genetic

proxies of telomere length and risk of cancer and found

evidence suggesting longer genetically inferred telomere

length is associated with increased cancer risk

[4 7]

. The

approach employed by these studies, Mendelian randomi-

zation, uses genetic variants associated with leukocyte

telomere length as genetic instruments to investigate the

relationship between leukocyte telomere length and RCC

risk. For resulting effect estimates to have a valid causal

interpretation, several conditions must hold: (1) the

telomere length associated variants must be associated

with telomere length in circulating leukocytes, (2) the

telomere length-associated variants should not be associ-

ated with other factors that are associated with telomere

length and RCC risk, and (3) the telomere length associated

variants can only influence RCC risk by their effect on

telomere length, that is they cannot have pleiotropic effects.

An advantage of this approach is that it is not susceptible to

the biases associated with measured telomere length as

described above. A recent investigation surveying several

chronic conditions suggested a marginal positive associa-

tion (

p

= 0.01) between genetically predicted telomere

length and RCC risk, although the sample size was smaller

(

N

= 2461 RCC cases)

[7]

.

In the present study, we evaluated RCC risk in relation to

individual telomere length-related genetic variants and an

aggregate genetic risk score (GRS) of telomere length-

associated genetic variants in a large sample of six RCC

GWAS datasets combined by meta-analysis to investigate a

potential etiologic relationship between telomere length

and RCC risk. We evaluated whether a genetic profile that is

associated with longer telomere length is associated with

risk of overall RCC and RCC subtypes, and investigated

potential modifiers of this relationship.

2.

Material and methods

The RCC GWAS meta-analysis included a total of 10 784 RCC cases and 20

406 controls of European ancestry from six independent scans

conducted at the International Agency for Cancer Research (IARC; two

scans totaling 5219 RCC cases and 8011 cancer-free controls; analyzed as

a combined dataset), the MD Anderson Cancer Center (893 RCC cases,

556 cancer-free controls), the US National Cancer Institute (NCI-1:

1311 RCC cases, 3424 cancer-free controls; NCI-2: 2417 RCC cases,

4391 cancer-free controls; analyzed separately), and the Institute of

Cancer Research (UK; 944 RCC cases, 4024 cancer-free controls)

[25]

. Cases were restricted to adults diagnosed with RCC, de

fi

ned on

the basis of the International Classi

fi

cation of Disease for Oncology 2nd

and 3rd Edition topography code C64. Samples were genotyped on

commercially available Illumina Single Nucleotide Polymorphism (SNP)

microarrays (HumanHap 300, HumanHap 500, HumanHap 610,

HumanHap 660w, HumanHap 1.2 M, OmniExpress, Omni5 M) after

standard quality control metrics. High-quality genotypes were phased

and imputation was performed using either MaCH (IARC) or IMPUTE2

(UK, NCI1, NCI2, and UK) with 1000 Genomes Project (Phase 1, Version 3)

samples used as a reference panel for imputing missing genotypes.

Protocols for studies participating in each GWAS were reviewed by the

Institutional Review Boards of their respective institutions. All partici-

pants provided written informed consent. Further details on study

design and methods have been previously reported

[25] .

For each study participant, genotypes were extracted for nine

previously identi

fi

ed common SNPs associated with telomere length in

circulating leukocytes (rs10936599, rs11125529, rs2736100, rs3027234,

rs6772228, rs755017, rs7675998, rs8105767, and rs9420907). Telomere

length-associated SNPs not directly genotyped were extracted from

imputed data for each scan (Supplementary Table 1)

[25] .

Risk of RCC was evaluated in relation to each of the nine telomere

length-associated variants. Association testing was conducted separately

E U R O P E A N U R O L O GY 7 2 ( 2 0 17 ) 74 7

7 5 4

749