Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  724 860 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 724 860 Next Page
Page Background

Table 1 (

Continued

)

Study

Patients, no.

Type of

study

Data source

Comparison Cost definition

Costs included

(direct vs indirect)

Perspective

Main findings

including comment

on risk of bias

Bijlani (2016)

[29]

NA

Cost modeling Review of the

published literature to

estimate outcomes

RARP

versus RRP

Costs modeled based

on care pathways and

published government

and other sources

Reimbursements for

procedure,

complications,

functional outcomes,

and adjuvant

treatment within 3 yr

Direct and indirect

costs

Hospital

Payer

Societal

RARP cost $341 (2014) more than RRP.

RARP saved $1451 (2014), mainly because of

lower complication, incontinence, and sexual

dysfunction costs.

RARP saved $1202 (2014) due to faster

recovery and less lost wages.

Risk of bias and potential for COI is high as this

study was conducted by Intuitive Surgical

employees.

Note: in the payer perspective analyses, no

sensitivity analyses are presented, which

would have been helpful as estimates around

incontinence and sexual dysfunction vary a lot

in the literature.

Study with unclear perspective

Sugihara (2014)

[82]

2126 RARP

7202 open RP

Retrospective

cohort study

DPC database

(Japanese inpatient

administrative claims

database) 2012–2013

RARP versus

open RP

Specific cost definition

not provided

Unclear

Median RARP cost: $15 676

Median open RP cost: $10 946

Difference: $4730

(no adjustment for inflation done)

In adjusted model, RARP 52% more costly than

open RP.

Risk of bias moderate as residual confounding

may have been present. Unclear what kind of

cost was examined and which perspective was

taken, as no details given in manuscript.

BMI = body mass index; CI = confidence interval; COI = conflict of interest; DPC = Diagnosis Procedure Combination; DRG = diagnosis-related group; f/u = follow-up; HCUP = Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project;

ICER = incremental cost effectiveness ratio; ICU = intensive care unit; LOS = length of stay; MIRP = minimally invasive radical prostatectomy; NA = not applicable; OR = operating room; QALY = quality-adjusted life year;

RARP = robot-assisted radical prostatectomy; RP = radical prostatectomy; SEER = Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results; SES = socioeconomic status; SF-36 = Short-form Health Survey 36.

MIRP was used in claims-based analyses when the codes did not allow for differentiation between RARP and pure laparoscopic prostatectomy. In these cases, the assumption was made that the vast majority of MIRPs are

RARPs.

Note

: for any cost data, the year to which inflation adjustment was made is indicated in parenthesis. Studies are sorted by perspective taken and then listed in chronological order based on the years included in the study.

E U R O P E A N U R O L O G Y 7 2 ( 2 0 1 7 ) 7 1 2 – 7 3 5

724