Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  734 860 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 734 860 Next Page
Page Background

[18]

Ubel PA, Hirth RA, Chernew ME, Fendrick AM. What is the price of life and why doesn’t it increase at the rate of inflation? Arch Intern Med 2003;163:1637

.

[19]

Marseille E, Larson B, Kazi DS, et al. Thresholds for the cost- effectiveness of interventions: alternative approaches. Bull World Health Organ 2015;93:118–24.

[20]

Shiroiwa T, Sung Y-K, Fukuda T, Lang H-C, Bae S-C, Tsutani K. International survey on willingness-to-pay (WTP) for one addition- al QALY gained: what is the threshold of cost effectiveness? Health Econ 2010;19:422–37.

[21]

Mouraviev V, Nosnik I, Sun L, et al. Financial comparative analysis of minimally invasive surgery to open surgery for localized prostate cancer: a single-institution experience. Urology 2007;69:311–4

.

[22]

Riley GF. Administrative and claims records as sources of health care cost data. Med Care 2009;47:S51–5

.

[23]

Leow JJ, Chang SL, Meyer CP, et al. Robot-assisted versus open radical prostatectomy: a contemporary analysis of an all-payer discharge database. Eur Urol 2016;70:837–45

.

[24]

Basto M, Sathianathen N, TeMarvelde L, et al. Patterns-of-care and health economic analysis of robot-assisted radical prostatectomy in the Australian public health system. BJU Int 2016;117:930–9

.

[25]

Scales Jr CD, Jones PJ, Eisenstein EL, Preminger GM, Albala DM. Local cost structures and the economics of robot assisted radical prosta- tectomy. J Urol 2005;174:2323–9.

[26]

Abdollah F, Buda¨us L, Sun M, et al. Impact of caseload on total hospital charges: a direct comparison between minimally invasive and open radical prostatectomy—a population based study. J Urol 2011;185:855–61.

[27]

Niklas C, Saar M, Berg B, et al. da Vinci and open radical prostatec- tomy: comparison of clinical outcomes and analysis of insurance costs. Urol Int 2016;96:287–94

.

[28]

Hughes D, Camp C, O’Hara J, Adshead J. Health resource use after robot-assisted surgery vs open and conventional laparoscopic tech- niquesinoncology: analysisof English secondary care data forradical prostatectomy and partial nephrectomy. BJU Int 2016;117:940–7.

[29]

Bijlani A, Hebert AE, DavitianM, et al. Amultidimensional analysis of prostate surgery costs in the united states: robotic-assisted versus retropubic radical prostatectomy. Value Health 2016;19:391–403.

[30]

Miller DC, Gust C, Dimick JB, Birkmeyer N, Skinner J, Birkmeyer JD. Large variations in Medicare payments for surgery highlight sav- ings potential from bundled payment programs. Health Aff Proj Hope 2011;30:2107–15

.

[31]

Shih Y-CT, Ward JF, Pettaway CA, et al. Comparative effectiveness, cost, and utilization of radical prostatectomy among young men withinmanaged care insurance plans. Value Health 2012;15:367–75.

[32]

Epstein AJ, Groeneveld PW, Harhay MO, Yang F, Polsky D. Impact of minimally invasive surgery on medical spending and employee absenteeism. JAMA Surg 2013;148:641–7

.

[33]

Kim SP, Gross CP, Smaldone MC, et al. Perioperative outcomes and hospital reimbursement by type of radical prostatectomy: results from a privately insured patient population. Prostate Cancer Pros- tatic Dis 2015;18:13–7

.

[34]

Bai G, Anderson GF. Extreme markup: the fifty US hospitals with the highest charge-to-cost ratios. Health Aff (Millwood) 2015;34:922–8.

[35]

Cooperberg MR, Ramakrishna NR, Duff SB, et al. Primary treatments for clinically localised prostate cancer: a comprehensive lifetime cost-utility analysis. BJU Int 2013;111:437–50

.

[36]

Eldefrawy A, Katkoori D, Abramowitz M, Soloway MS, Manoharan M. Active surveillance vs. treatment for low-risk prostate cancer: a cost comparison. Urol Oncol 2013;31:576–80

.

[37]

O’Malley SP, Jordan E. Review of a decision by the Medical Services Advisory Committee based on health technology assessment of an emerging technology: The case for remotely assisted radical pros- tatectomy. Int J Technol Assess Health Care 2007;23:286–91.

[38]

Hohwu¨ L, Borre M, Ehlers L, Venborg Pedersen K. A short-term cost- effectiveness study comparing robot-assisted laparoscopic and open retropubic radical prostatectomy. J Med Econ 2011;14: 403–9.

[39]

Nguyen PL, Gu X, Lipsitz SR, et al. Cost implications of the rapid adoption of newer technologies for treating prostate cancer. J Clin Oncol 2011;29:1517–24

.

[40]

Yong JHE, Beca J, McGowan T, Bremner KE, Warde P, Hoch JS. Cost- effectiveness of intensity-modulated radiotherapy in prostate can- cer. Clin Oncol 2012;24:521–31

.

[41]

Konski A. Cost-effectiveness of intensity-modulated radiation ther- apy. Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res 2005;5:137–40.

[42]

Yong JHE, McGowan T, Redmond-Misner R, et al. Estimating the costs of intensity-modulated and 3-dimensional conformal radio- therapy in Ontario. Curr Oncol 2016;23:e228–38.

[43] Zemple´nyi A t., Kalo´ Z, Kova´cs G, et al. Cost-effectiveness analysis of

intensity-modulated radiation therapy with normal and hypofrac-

tionated schemes for the treatment of localised prostate cancer. Eur

J Cancer Care (Engl). In press.

http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/ecc.12430

.

[44]

Carter HE, Martin A, Schofield D, et al. A decision model to estimate the cost-effectiveness of intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) compared to three dimensional conformal radiation thera- py (3DCRT) in patients receiving radiotherapy to the prostate bed. Radiother Oncol 2014;112:187–93.

[45]

Konski A, Speier W, Hanlon A, Beck JR, Pollack A. Is proton beam therapy cost effective in the treatment of adenocarcinoma of the prostate? J Clin Oncol 2007;25:3603–8

.

[46]

Lundkvist J, Ekman M, Ericsson SR, Jo¨nsson B, Glimelius B. Proton therapy of cancer: potential clinical advantages and cost-effective- ness. Acta Oncol 2005;44:850–61

.

[47]

Yaxley JW, Coughlin GD, Chambers SK, et al. Robot-assisted lapa- roscopic prostatectomy versus open radical retropubic prostatec- tomy: early outcomes from a randomised controlled phase 3 study. Lancet 2016;388:1057–66

.

[48]

Novara G, Ficarra V, Mocellin S, et al. Systematic review and meta- analysis of studies reporting oncologic outcome after robot- assisted radical prostatectomy. Eur Urol 2012;62:382–404

.

[49]

Ficarra V, Novara G, Rosen RC, et al. Systematic review and meta- analysis of studies reporting urinary continence recovery after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy. Eur Urol 2012;62:405–17

.

[50]

Ficarra V, Novara G, Ahlering TE, et al. Systematic review and meta- analysis of studies reporting potency rates after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy. Eur Urol 2012;62:418–30

.

[51]

Yu T, Zhang Q, Zheng T, et al. The effectiveness of intensity modu- lated radiation therapy versus three-dimensional radiation therapy in prostate cancer: a meta-analysis of the literatures. PLoS One 2016;11:e0154499

.

[52]

Hall EJ. Wuu C-S. Radiation-induced second cancers: the impact of 3D-CRT and IMRT. Int J Radiat Oncol 2003;56:83–8

.

[53] Proton therapy vs. IMRT for low or intermediate risk prostate

cancer PARTIQoL 2016.

https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/ NCT01617161

.

[54]

Moon DH, Efstathiou JA, Chen RC. What is the best way to radiate the prostate in 2016? Urol Oncol 2017;35:59–68

.

[55]

Fang P, Mick R, Deville C, et al. A case-matched study of toxicity outcomes after proton therapy and intensity-modulated radiation therapy for prostate cancer. Cancer 2015;121:1118–27

.

[56]

Gray PJ, Paly JJ, Yeap BY, et al. Patient-reported outcomes after 3- dimensional conformal, intensity-modulated, or proton beam ra- diotherapy for localized prostate cancer. Cancer 2013;119:1729–35

.

[57]

Hoppe BS, Michalski JM, Mendenhall NP, et al. Comparative effec- tiveness study of patient-reported outcomes after proton therapy or intensity-modulated radiotherapy for prostate cancer. Cancer 2014;120:1076–82.

E U R O P E A N U R O L O G Y 7 2 ( 2 0 1 7 ) 7 1 2 – 7 3 5

734