Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  719 860 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 719 860 Next Page
Page Background

Bijlani (2016)

[29]

NA

Cost modeling Review of the

published literature to

estimate outcomes

RARP

versus RRP

Costs modeled based

on care pathways and

published government

and other sources

Reimbursements for

procedure,

complications,

functional outcomes,

and adjuvant

treatment within 3 yr

Direct and indirect

costs, including

purchase and

maintenance cost of

robot

Hospital

Payer

Societal

RARP cost $341 (2014) more than RRP.

RARP saved $1451 (2014), mainly because of

lower complication, incontinence, and sexual

dysfunction costs.

RARP saved $1202 due to faster recovery and

less lost wages.

Risk of bias and potential for COI is high as this

study was conducted by Intuitive Surgical

employees.

Note: In the payer perspective analyses, no

sensitivity analyses are presented, which

would have been helpful as estimates around

incontinence and sexual dysfunction vary a lot

in the literature.

Studies from the payer’s perspective

Burgess (2006)

[75]

78 RARP

16 RRP

Retrospective

cohort study

Institutional database

2002–2004

RARP

versus RRP

Hospital charges

obtained from patient

bills

Only charges

measured

Payer

Mean RARP charges: $39 315 (2003)

Mean RRP charges: $31 518 (2003)

Difference RARP versus RRP: $7797 (2003)

Risk of bias high because the above costs were

not adjusted for patient factors and because

the number of included patients was low.

Nguyen (2011)

[39]

N

not given for

MIRP and RRP

Retrospective

cohort study

SEER-Medicare 2002–

2005

MIRP

versus RRP

Medicare payments in

the year after

diagnosis minus those

in the year prior to

diagnosis

Medicare payments

Payer

Mean MIRP cost: $16 762 (2008)

Mean RRP cost: $16 469 (2008)

Difference: $293 (2008)

Risk of bias high. No adjusted models were

constructed. MIRP patients were of better

socioeconomic status and had lower-risk

disease.

Additionally, Medicare reimbursement varies

by many intentional factors other than type of

treatment, including, for example, price

differences based on regional wage disparities,

cost of living, illness severity, and expense of

caring for underinsured patients

[16]

.

E U R O P E A N U R O L O G Y 7 2 ( 2 0 1 7 ) 7 1 2 – 7 3 5

719