Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  776 860 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 776 860 Next Page
Page Background

Table 1 – Summary of results of intergroup (shock wave lithotripsy [SWL] vs ureteroscopy [URS]) comparative studies

Study ID

Treatment Comparator

Outcome

No. of

patients

Value, % (

n

)

p

value

Treat Com Treat

Com

Manzoor 2013

[20]

SWL

URS

SFR 1 wk

12 mm

>

12 mm

192 192 49.2 (94)

44.6 (88)

52 (99)

57.8 (111)

46.1 (89)

66.7 (128)

0.088

0.88

0.019

RTR

40 (77)

11 (21)

NR

SP

22 (42)

18 (35)

NR

Zhang 2011

[21]

SWL

URS

SFR 2 wk

86 69 89.5 (77)

81.2 (56)

0.138

DHS, mean d

5.5

7.8

<

0.001

Post-op visits

1.07

1.09

0.809

CA (total charge $)

460

1395

1.09

Kumar 2010

[35]

SWL

URS

SFR

90 90 82.2(74)

86.6 (78)

0.34

SFR

<

10 mm

51 51 84.3(43)

86.3 (44)

0.32

SFR 10–20 mm

39 39 79.5(31)

89.7 (35)

0.12

CR

90 90 6.6 (6)

11.1 (10)

0.21

RTR

61.1 (55)

1.1 (1)

0.001

SP

21.1 (19)

17.7 (16)

0.45

Salem 2009

[22]

SWL

URS

SFR

100 100 71 (71)

96 (96)

>

0.05

SFR

<

1 cm

58 52 80 (46)

100 (52)

>

0.05

SFR 1 cm

52 48 60 (25)

88 (44)

>

0.05

CG 1

100 100 23 (23)

10 (10)

NR

CG 2

2 (2)

N/A

NR

CG 3

29 (29)

17 (17)

NR

HER

3 (3)

2 (2)

NR

DP, mean min (range)

60.55 (40–75)

34.3 (22–66)

NR

RT

22 (22)

0 (0)

NR

AP

0 (0)

13 (13)

NR

SP

7 (7)

4 (4)

NR

EDV

20 (20)

5 (5)

NR

Lee 2006

[11]

SWL

URS

SFR

22 20 63.6 (14)

35 (7)

NR

SFR 1 session

31.8 (7)

N/A

NR

SFR 2 sessions

22.7 (5)

N/A

NR

SFR 3 sessions

4.5 (1)

N/A

NR

SFR 4 sessions

4.5 (1)

N/A

NR

CG 1

0 (0)

15 (3)

NR

CG 2

9 (2)

35 (7)

NR

CG 3

0 (0)

30 (6)

NR

UI

0 (0)

30 (6)

NR

HER

0 (0)

5 (1)

NR

DP, min SD

43.2 5.0

109.0 50.0

<

0.0001

RTR

31.8 (7)

0 (0)

NR

AP

0 (0)

55 (11)

NR

SP

22.7 (5)

40 (8)

NR

Pain (VAS score), mean SD

1.86 0.94

4.35 2.45

<

0.0001

DHS, mean days SD

1.8 0.4

4.7 2.0

<

0.0001

Bhoir 2014

[36]

SWL

URS

SFR Overall

55 65 74.54 (41)

89.23 (58)

NR

Cui 2014

[23]

SWL

URS

SFR SWL 1

SFR SWL 2

SFR SWL 3

80 80 77.5 (62)

87.5 (70)

92.5 (74)

97.5 (78)

97.5 (78)

97.5 (78)

0.018

0.20

0.61

DP, mean mins SD

40.0 10.0

42.5 11.3

0.29

RTR SWL 1

RTR SWL 2

RTR SWL 3

NR

15 (12)

7.5 (6)

0(0)

0(0)

0(0)

NR

NR

NR

UI

0 (0)

0%

NR

HER

20 (16)

2.5 (2)

<

0.05

VS

6.25

33.75

<

0.05

QOL

90

83.75

>

0.05

Pain, mean mg tramadol SD

0 ( 0)

80.5 ( 31.6)

<

0.05

Natarajan 2014

[37]

SWL

URS

SFR SWL 1

SFR SWL 2

SFR SWL 3

88 186 34.5 (30)

62.4 (55)

86.6 (76)

88.4 (164)

N/A

N/A

>

0.05

NR

NR

Khalil 2013

[24]

SWL

URS

SFR SWL 1

SFR 1 mo

SFR 3 mo

37 45 56.8 (21)

67.6 (25)

78.4 (29)

80 (36)

80 (36)

82.2 (37)

<

0.05

<

0.05

>

0.05

Mean no. of sessions SD

1.5 0.8

1.02 0.15

<

0.01

CG I

CG II

CG IIIb

16.2 (6)

2.7 (1)

5.4 (2)

2.2 (1)

4.4 (2)

6.7 (3)

NR

NR

NR

E U R O P E A N U R O L O G Y 7 2 ( 2 0 1 7 ) 7 7 2 – 7 8 6

776