Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  704 860 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 704 860 Next Page
Page Background

Table 6 (

Continued

)

Retrospective studies

Study

Patients (

N

)

Type of RT

Follow-up

(median)

Urinary side effects

Sexual side effects

Bowel side effects

Comments

Showalter et al

[65]

2176 vs 7700 pts

who received

postoperative RT vs

RP alone

NA

49.8 vs

50.7 mo

RT was associated with higher

risk of GU non-incontinence

events

No differences in GU

incontinence events

RT did not increase the

risk of ED

RT associated with significantly

higher risk of GI events

Population-based study

Urinary, sexual, and bowel

complications defined

according to administrative

codes

Lack of details on type of RT

administered

Lack of discrimination between

aRT and sRT

Gandaglia et al

[12]

74 vs 642 pts treated

with aRT vs nerve-

sparing RP alone

RT within 6 mo from RP

with undetectable PSA

levels

48 mo

NA

Patients who did not

receive aRT had higher 3-

yr erectile function

recovery compared with

those treated with aRT

(59.8 vs 40.7%;

p

<

0.001)

NA

EF defined according to the

IIEF-EF score

van Stam et al

[10]

241 vs 1,005 pts

treated with sRT vs

RP alone

NA

NA

Pts receiving sRT had worse

recovery of urinary continence

Pts receiving sRT had

worse recovery of erectile

function

sRT associated with a higher rate

of diarrhea

Patients with a longer interval

(

>

6 mo) between RP and SRT

reported significantly better

sexual satisfaction after SRT

(

p

= 0.02) and better urinary

function recovery

Jereczek-Fossa

et al

[69]

208 pts treated with

aRT or sRT

IMRT to the prostatic

bed vs whole pelvis RT

27 mo

No differences in acute and late

toxicities

NA

No differences in acute and late

toxicities

No patients treated with CRT

Zaffuto et al

[71]

199 vs 128 vs

1863 pts treated

with aRT vs sRT vs

RP only

aRT within 6 mo from

RP with undetectable

PSA levels

48 mo

The 3-yr UC 17 recovery rates

were 70.7, 59.0 and 42.2% in no

RT, sRT 18 and aRT (

p

<

0.001)

The 3-yr EF recovery rates

were 35.0, 29.0 and 11.6%

in no RT, sRT and aRT

(p

<

0.001)

NA

EF defined according to the

IIEF-EF score

UC defined as the use of no

pads over the 24-h period

ADT = androgen-deprivation therapy; aRT = adjuvant radiotherapy; BCR = biochemical recurrence; ED = erectile dysfunction; EF = erectile function; GI = gastro-intestinal; IIEF-EF = international index of erectile function-

erectile function domain; IMRT = intensity-modulated radiotherapy; NA = not available; PSA = prostate specific antigen; pts = patients; RP = radical prostatectomy; sRT = salvage radiotherapy; WPRT = whole-pelvis RT;

WS = wait-and-see; 3DCRT: three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy.

E U R O P E A N U R O L O G Y 7 2 ( 2 0 1 7 ) 6 8 9 – 7 0 9

704